The communities where most of my readers live are situated in rolling hills or mountains. 4G cell service is spotty- we get it second hand from a nearby city. 4G as a technology has the potential to provide all our communication services at a low cost compared to what we pay today.
However, our "standard" internet service is ATT DSL with a max of 6M and it is costly. Some of our members have gone to a satellite service, but that is expensive and doesn't move the speed bar that much. I think all of us have to use a satellite service for TV, which is, in itself, expensive compared to options that can bundle all communication services on the same infrastructure.
Some in our communities are lookiing at Uverse-like solutions, solutions that run over fiber and then copper wires. Those technologies are self limiting because they either include small copper wires, which have limited signal capacity and are degrade the signal with distance, or they include expensive fiber. Whether it is cable, Uverse, or satellite, they are not long term, economical communication service solutions.
4G, which you should recognize as something your cell phones might use, is a technology that is coming into its own as a community communication service. I've been talking with Verizon tech about "
LTE in Rural America Program", VOLTE, and "
Small Cell". (Follow the links for background.) I've also been keeping track of Verizon progress on the flagpole- technical issues, etc. Small Cell coupled with the LTEiRA looks like the best choice, but we may have to invest in the Small Cell as a community.
A typical, non-dedicated LTE broadband service can provide a download speed in excess of 30mb/s and an upload speed in excess of 15 mb/s.
LTE-Advanced can provide peak rates up to 1 Gbit/s fixed speeds and 100 Mb/s to mobile users.
I would welcome others who know about how 4G would work for a geography and low population density such as ours to comment below.